Storm’s a comin’, Mother.

My hatches are battened. My car is frozen to the ground anyway; I don’t think it needs battening.

Apparently today it’s going to snow a little bit for every time over the last 5 years that I have said, “It might snow tonight.” That’s a lot of snow, people. Oooooeeeeee!

I know I shouldn’t go near canada.com except to log in to my old email account. I realize I incur a great moral debt when I grace its stories with my time & energy. But I see the headlines and before I can stop myself, I have to go to the stories. I know they will make me angry, but I do it anyway.

Double-threat to my usual happy-go-lucky-flitty-fairy mood this morning: an article about the fatal shooting in Gastown on the weekend, plus the interview with a man on CBC radio’s Early Edition who claims the shooting “never would have happened if the bars weren’t open till 4 am.” OK Mr.Semantic-pants. It would have happened 2 hours earlier, then. Happy?

The article says: Fatal Gastown Fight over Girl. Next to the headline is a photo of Rachel Davis. Rachel Davis is not the girl referred to in the headline. She is the girl who was walking down the street, saw a guy getting the shit kicked out of him and stepped in to help. She was shot for her trouble.

It is disrespectful to use the picture and the persona of Rachel Davis to try to bolster bad journalism. We recognize her face by now and it breaks our hearts because her picture does portray her as her parents and friends have described her: sunny, happy, creative, bursting with potential. Her face does not belong next to an already inflammatory headline. Can’t get a picture of the chick who started it all? Put up somebody else’s picture. As long as people read the article, right?

No. None of this is Rachel Davis’ fault. Nor is it the fault of the chick with the great ass who wouldn’t go home with gun-guy one and chose gun-guy two. It is not the fault of the Purple Onion, of Gastown, of Vancouver, of drug dealers, of police officers, of 4 am bar closures, or the snow. It is the fault of the dickhead with the gun and it is the fault of that part of his brain that says, “I am going to carry around something that kills people because I am just that fucking great. I need to preserve my own greatness as much as possible by killing anyone who says I’m not great or gets in the way of how great I am.” It is his fault.

In 1996 the all-time Vancouver record for snowfall in one day – 41 cm – was recorded. This is what it looked like when our kitten Elvis (for Costello, thank you) was placed on the snow (those green things are garbage cans):

Damn those were cute kittens (and one stinky basement suite):

It was nicer outside:

Posted in | Comments Off on Storm’s a comin’, Mother.

inertance cataract

Today, as I ate endless chips with hummus and tried to stay warm, I thought: spammers. Could they be poets, tortured and misunderstood, one empty juice jug away from a head in the oven or a neck in the noose, trying to get our attention with their brief, confused missives? Maybe – they just want a little love & understanding?

Moments later, I received the following email from Miranda Jeanie. I do not know her, but she must know me.

Subject: Re: LLHRA, breaking to pieces

crouch bonze assailant jarvin
blatant bit soot
rhinoceros bluster chugging asbestos
toss knudson
bellhop at crawford
indestructible riverside inertance cataract
Free Cable+ TV

From the start, she places the onus on me to remember the email I sent her about breaking to pieces. She knows that sometimes I have sad days, just like anyone. It’s not all about garlic cream cheese and Solly’s bagels.

Of course, she has to tell me about the free Cable + TV – or she’ll get fired. (Just like those kids who try to sell you a newspaper subscription over the phone aren’t allowed to laugh when you say “I don’t want your shitty subscription because there is no amount of money that would make [your paper] worth reading! It’s a crap tabloid with no journalistic intent and I wish you’d invest some of your telemarketing dollars in better writers!”)

But what I hear in these choice (code?) words from Miranda is how desperate she is for a friend, someone who can really understand her scattered musings, unconventional word combinations, completely out-of-control obsession with Nelly and his song “Hot in Here.” She needs a friend who will know when to call the paramedics. Someone to feed her cat when she is at Lollapalooza ’05. Oh, Miranda. Why do you allow your words to be swallowed by the corporate whale? You have observations to fill a blog of your own! Call it “The Remmas Blog.” Tell your stories and see how supportive the world can be. We all can appreciate true genius.

Posted in | Comments Off on inertance cataract

Tell me!

I would love to know why someone was googling for miniskirted crocodiles.

If you are that person, first, I’m sorry your search led you here. What a let-down! And second, if you’ve read this far, could you let me know what fabulous thing I’m missing?

Posted in | Comments Off on Tell me!

Even those “tough to clean” items, like wine glasses.

Yesterday I was chained to the couch and forced to watch the Jamie’s Kitchen Marathon. As usual, with TV, this six hours of my life raised more questions than answers.

Jamie’s Kitchen Mararthon FAQ:

Who the hell is Jamie Oliver anyway?

A celebrity Chef. He cooks simple, no-nonsense, elegant food. And he’s (allegedly) cute, with a lopsided grin that people seem to find attractive. He also has a hell of a lisp but hey – that’s not his fault.
See? Irreverent.

Why broadcast all 6 hours of this “reality” show on New Year’s Day?

I suspect because nobody cared to watch it the first time. Plus: two new episodes at the end!

What is this show “Jamie’s Kitchen” about, anyway?

Jamie Oliver, Celebrity Chef, decides to open a restaurant. He decides to staff it with 15 young people who don’t know how to cook. He trains them to cook and then employs them in his restaurant, which he calls “Fifteen.” By the end of the show, there are 7 trainees left in his kitchen. But the restuarant is still called “Fifteen.” You can eat there, but make a reservation. And it’s in London.

Are there any compelling characters?

Yes: Jamie Oliver’s wife, Jools. She has a newborn baby at the beginning of the series and delivers another one near the end. That’s all we see of Jools. I predict a sequel, called “Jamie’s Divorce.”

Any other compelling characters?

No.

Really?

Really. The kids who are good, smart and obedient are not profiled at all. The kids who skip school, mouth off, punch walls and threaten the headmaster are followed closely, but they’re little shitheads and you really aren’t pulling for them. At hour three, I was shrieking at the screen, “Send the ungrateful bastard back to South London! Hire someone who can take direction! For the love of your wife!”

I think JO is meant be portrayed as some sort of saint; he has endless “heart-to-heart” talks with these troublesome trainees and the trainees continue to screw him over. He mostly comes across as a poor businessman who is darn stubborn. By hour four when the accountant says, “you’re up to 1.5 million pounds now. that’s more than double the original budget,” I see no real remorse or fear in Jamie’s face. He’s laughing his ass off. And I think that might be because he’s a very rich man and the “budget” of which the accountant speaks is merely a late addition to the script, meant to build tension for us, the viewers.

Is there coarse language in “Jamie’s Kitchen” that might offend my delicate ears?

That depends. The words “piss,” “shit” and “bugger” are all used liberally. The word “fuck” and its derivatives are bleeped out, which makes understanding what these people are saying very difficult. First, there’s the accent. Then there’s JO’s lisp. And plus, now I’m missing every fourth word.

After each commercial and before each segment, the television warned us in dire tones that there was offensive language. But it failed to deliver! I will be writing to the Food Network Canada to complain.

The two new episodes left “fuck” in. Except for within a few minutes of the end of the second, where the censor woke up from his nap – not that I blame him, it was a long series – and started bleeping again.

Didn’t Martika have a show like this?

Yes, Martika’s Kitchen. The chorus goes, “Get some, get some, get some, in Martika’s Kitchen, baby.”

The beginning credits for the penultimate episode in the marathon, “Back to Jamie’s Kitchen,” show Jamie dressed in his chef’s whites, getting on his moped, putting on his helmet and sunglasses and speeding off through London. At one point, a white van changes lanes and Jamie and the camera that are attached to his head get knocked off the bike and sent spinning off onto the sidewalk. He does not get up and walk away. What the hell?

No idea. This scene was not repeated or explained. An initial search of the internet didn’t turn up anything. But I’m a little scared of delving too deeply into the Jamie Oliver fan sites so it wasn’t a very thorough search.

Can I conclude from this marathon that women are lazier and more troublesome than men?

Absolutely! C’mon: I sat on the couch for 6 hours, watching something I wasn’t really enjoying. That’s lazy.

For another thing, the females in Jamie’s Kitchen give him much more trouble than the males. Sure, one of the guys has anger management issues, but at least they all work hard and show signs of brilliance. The females just stand around and complain about how hard their lives are. Then again, this might be a reaction to Jamie not ever referring to a female by name, but insisting on calling them “shweethaht” “dahling” and “gohghuss.”
I especially liked when Jamie suggested that one of the trainee women “show [‘im] yeh tits dahling!” as they are driving past a cyclist in the British countryside. I would rather have heard each utterance of “fuck” for 6 hours than hear Jamie treat the female trainees like an unwanted litter of puppies. That’s probably just me, though.

I hate washing my dishes with yesterday’s smelly dishcloth. It’s so germ-laden! Is there a solution?

See? Lazy!

But yes, thanks for asking! Palmolive Dishwipes allow you to use one cloth per load of dishes (apparently, that’s 21 dishes. They did a study…) and then just toss it away! After all, as the woman in the commercial says, “There’s plenty more where that came from!”

Palmolive was a sponsor of the Jamie’s Kitchen Marathon. The commercial was shown once per break. That’s roughly 50 times (I did my own study…). Each time I saw it, I wanted less to buy the product. They should invite me to more focus groups.

I can not believe this product exists. I can not believe an R&D team got money to develop a “cloth with the Palmolive liquid built right in,” that an advertising company got the account, that people in the world have expressed dissatisaction with the “old-fashioned” method of cleaning more than one load of dishes with the same cloth, that no one stopped the ad campaign and said, “there may be more where they came from, but where are they going when you throw them away? have you heard of landfills?”

In short, I can not believe that it is 2004 and we, as a culture, are becoming more instead of less wasteful, stupid and short sighted.

Posted in | 1 Comment

nothing.

b2 is being weird. this is proof. ignore.

Posted in | Comments Off on nothing.